![]() |
Quality Assurance |
|||||||
|
|
Quality Assurance (QA) TDL is experienced in subcontractor and vendor management, supported by demonstrated processes and procedures, ensuring high-quality results. Schedule Effectiveness Risks TDL ensures quality by employing performance metrics at each stage of a program. Performance metrics include specific program requirements and milestones. Milestones, such as Preliminary Design Reviews and Critical Design Reviews, are anticipated at specific times in the systems engineering process. These major milestones become auditing events against which requirements and schedule are compared. When the standard or performance metric is not met, the Program Manager is required to provide a Corrective Action Plan to bring the performance back to the established metric. All subcontractors will be evaluated, at appropriate intervals, to ensure they meet the initial criteria and any new requirements. Verification of purchased and/or subcontracted products is accomplished through receiving inspections, source inspection, testing, or reviews and audits. TDL practices both in-house and source quality inspections. In-process controls greatly affect final quality. But in-house inspection or testing is not completely adequate. Verification tests require unique test and evaluation equipment that is only available at the source, often indicating the need to inspect an item or service. Where source inspection or in-process inspections are performed, the Quality Administrator, project Quality Manager, or Project Engineer completes an inspection record and distributes it to the appropriate program elements. Deficient products or services may require a Corrective Action Report (CAR). If a CAR is issued, the TDL QA manager specifies when the corrective action will be complete and the when the retest or re-inspection will take place. Retest or re-inspection data are maintained as part of the program record, including certificates of conformance.
|
|
||||||